BJ88: Is utilizing a “ruweda” a reasonable method for matching players in a sabong derby?

Delving into the world of Sabong derbies unveils a unique method known as the “ruweda” for pairing roosters. But the question arises: Is this method fair? Let’s explore the intricacies of using a ruweda and whether it aligns with the principles of fairness in cockfighting.

Sabong, or cockfighting, has been a beloved pastime and cultural tradition in the Philippines for centuries. Central to this tradition are Sabong derbies, where roosters are pitted against each other in thrilling matches of skill and strategy. One of the key aspects of a Sabong derby is the pairing of roosters, a process that often involves the use of a “ruweda,” or wheel, to determine matchups. But as with any method of selection, questions arise about its fairness and integrity. In this article, we’ll delve into the debate surrounding the use of a ruweda in Sabong derbies and explore both sides of the argument.

The Argument for Fairness

Proponents of using a ruweda argue that it provides a random and impartial method for pairing roosters in Sabong derbies. The wheel is typically divided into sections, each representing a different rooster, and is spun to determine the matchups. This random selection process ensures that no individual or entity has control over the pairings, thus minimizing the potential for bias or favoritism. Additionally, proponents contend that using a ruweda adds an element of excitement and unpredictability to Sabong derbies, enhancing the overall experience for participants and spectators alike.

The Argument Against Fairness

Critics of using a ruweda raise concerns about the lack of transparency and accountability in the pairing process. Unlike other methods, such as manual selection by derby organizers or drawing lots, the use of a ruweda may leave room for manipulation or tampering. There have been allegations of individuals rigging the wheel or influencing its outcome to ensure favorable matchups for certain roosters or participants. This perceived lack of fairness undermines the integrity of Sabong derbies and erodes trust in the sport as a whole.


Amidst the debate over the fairness of using a ruweda in Sabong derbies, there is a growing consensus that transparency and accountability are paramount. While the wheel itself may offer a random method of pairing roosters, it is essential to implement safeguards and oversight mechanisms to ensure its integrity. This includes measures such as independent auditing of the ruweda, strict adherence to guidelines and regulations, and penalties for any individuals found to be engaging in misconduct or manipulation. By fostering transparency and accountability, organizers can help restore confidence in the fairness of Sabong derbies and uphold the integrity of the sport.


In the world of Sabong derbies, the use of a ruweda to determine pairings remains a topic of debate among enthusiasts and participants alike. While proponents argue that it offers a random and impartial method for pairing roosters, critics raise concerns about transparency and accountability. Striking a balance between these competing perspectives is essential to ensure the integrity of Sabong derbies and maintain the trust of participants and spectators. Ultimately, by fostering transparency, accountability, and adherence to regulations, organizers can uphold the principles of fairness in cockfighting and preserve the rich tradition of Sabong for generations to come.